Post Freudian theorists and their theories Essay Example for Free

Post Freudian theorists and their theories EssayAs indicated earlier, key personality cultureal theories that were developed after Freuds psychoanalytic theory were either directly derived of it or aimed at criticizing some of its major components. a) Erik Erickson i) Stages of development Barbara (2008) and Lieberman (2007) agree that the work of Eric Erickson was a direct derivative of Freudian considerations in human development. Eric Erickson theory of psychosocial development concurred with Freudian view that life, development and challenges develop in stages.Psychosocial theory further builds the notion of the ego which was by and large brought out by Freud as external reality inculcation to ones mind. Particularly, the stages of Erickson psychosocial development strongly flummox with Sigmunds work. Clara et al (2008) explain that stage one of Ericksons theory of psychosocial development is reflected through trust versus mistrust for the most part because the child is entirely dependent on the caregivers.Like Freud mentioned the pleasure a child derives from oral stimulation, Erickson exclamatory on the resulting intimacy as a platform in propelling the child to the next stages. Therefore, Ericksons first stage borrows the concept of external environment in creating enough force for the next stage. In the second stage of psychosocial development, Erickson equally borrows from Freuds anal stage which is a critical training factor. Nelson-Jones (2005) explains that from a higher consideration, Erickson argued that learning to go to the toilet gave a strong sense of control and therefore with child(p) independence.As Freud clearly brought out the notion of the ego, Ericksons third stage of initiative versus guilt emphasizes the financial statement of power and control which plays an important role in the later stages development. Erickson indicated that many children seek to assert their favorable position among others but with careful consider ations of the existing repercussions (Marrie and Janneke-van, 2007). Notably, Erickson agrees with Freud that parents and caretakers must step in to facilitate the needed reassurance and therefore head off guilt to their young ones.It is however worth noting that Erickson strongly differed with Freud on how long development persists in an persons life. While Freud postulated that personality development only lasted to the genital stage when an individual(a) starts getting raise in sexual relationship with those of the opposite sex, Erickson postulated that developed progressed to the old age (Busch, 2009). However, scholars appear to be strongly divided with one group considering the latter Ericksons work to be based on reproval of the Freuds work and therefore its advancement (Barbara, 2008).ii) The notion of fixation One resilient notion of Freuds work is the notion of succession between different stages. though they do not necessary cohere on time and expected repercussions, both theorists agree that people at different stages must go through them successfully or get fixated (Hayes, 2004). Fixation as Henry (2009) point out denotes the inability to progress since latter stages are entirely dependent on the previous stages success. Erickson argued that all stages present an individual with two negating outcomes positive and negative.For example between year five to eleven, Erickson indicated that a successful individual testament become industrious while the unsuccessful ones will suffer inferiority (Laura and Pam, 2007). b) Lacanian theory In his work, largely referred to as the return of Freud, Emile Lacans concepts appear to be fully defined by the former (Adam, 2008). Though Lacan strongly criticized the Freuds separation of the conscious (ego) and unconscious (id), he largely employed the same concepts in his work.Lacan argued that the conscious and unconscious considerations of the mind were not different, but operated from a highly sophisticate d and complex compend compared to Freuds consideration. Locan mirror as Brickman (2009) and Gottdiener (2008) conclusions suggest is formative and a derivative of the experience an individual gets during development. Therefore, the trope of the imagery to be effective during the younger years as opposed to the old age which is more(prenominal) subjective fits the Freudian connotation of development persisting only to the genital stage.